Summary
Developed by HashiCorp, Nomad is a flexible, lightweight workload orchestrator. Kubernetes, originally developed by Google, is a container orchestration tool with a comprehensive feature set.
As modern enterprises adopt more complex, cloud-native architectures, container orchestration has become a critical component of software development and deployment. Containers offer a way to package and deploy applications consistently across environments, but managing them at scale requires sophisticated orchestration tools. Nomad and Kubernetes are two of the most prominent container orchestration platforms in the industry today, each with its unique strengths and target use cases.
In this article, we’ll examine these tools to help enterprise decision makers and IT experts make an informed choice based on their specific requirements.
What Is Nomad?
Nomad, developed by HashiCorp, is a flexible, lightweight workload orchestrator that has gained significant traction since its 2015 release. It distinguishes itself through its ability to manage both containerized and non-containerized applications across diverse environments, from on-premises data centers to cloud platforms.
Simple Architecture
Nomad follows a single binary architecture, meaning it doesn’t require multiple components to manage or deploy. This simplicity reduces overhead and makes it easier to configure and scale.
- Single binary deployment model
- Minimal external dependencies
- Built-in scheduler with sophisticated bin packing
- Native service discovery integration through Consul
Multi-cloud and Hybrid Support
Nomad can orchestrate workloads across multiple environments, including on-premises infrastructure and public clouds like AWS, Azure, and GCP.
- Cloud-agnostic design
- Native support for AWS, Azure, and GCP
- Unified workflow across different environments
- Consistent scheduling policies across platforms
Heterogeneous Workloads
Unlike Kubernetes, which focuses primarily on containerized applications, Nomad supports a wider range of workloads, including virtual machines, Java apps, and batch processing jobs.
- Support for Docker containers
- Native execution drivers for non-containerized applications
- Java application support
- Windows workload compatibility
- Legacy application integration capabilities
Resource Efficiency
Nomad is known for being lightweight and resource-efficient, capable of scaling to tens of thousands of nodes with a minimal footprint.
- Lightweight resource footprint
- Efficient scheduling algorithms
- Minimal operational overhead
- High-performance scheduling decisions
Organizations That Benefit from Nomad
Small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Nomad’s simplicity and lower operational complexity make it an attractive option for smaller organizations that may not have large DevOps teams.
Multi-cloud organizations: Organizations that require flexibility across different cloud providers will appreciate Nomad’s agnostic support for multi-cloud and hybrid environments.
Mixed workload environments: Enterprises running legacy applications or a mix of containerized and non-containerized workloads can benefit from Nomad’s ability to orchestrate both kinds of workloads seamlessly while doing a gradual containerization journey.
What Is Kubernetes?
Kubernetes, originally developed by Google and now maintained by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), has evolved into the de facto standard for container orchestration. Its feature set and robust ecosystem make it particularly suitable for complex, containerized applications at scale.
Comprehensive Ecosystem
Kubernetes has a vast ecosystem of tools and integrations, making it highly customizable and adaptable to different needs. It includes everything from networking, storage, and security plugins to logging and monitoring solutions.
- Extensive selection of CNI plugins
- Rich service mesh integrations
- Advanced monitoring and logging solutions
- Robust security frameworks
Advanced Orchestration Capabilities
Kubernetes can automatically scale applications based on resource utilization and self-heal in case of pod failures, ensuring high availability and resilience.
- Horizontal and vertical pod autoscaling
- Rolling updates and rollbacks
- Self-healing mechanisms
- Advanced load balancing
- StatefulSet management for stateful applications
Enterprise-grade Features
With features that are sometimes even touted to be too complex for simple applications, Kubernetes is packed with enterprise-grade features that are handy for managing and orchestrating complex applications.
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- Network policies
- Secret management
- Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs)
- Advanced persistent volume management
Declarative Configuration
Kubernetes uses a declarative approach where users define the desired state of the system (e.g., the number of replicas of an application) and Kubernetes ensures that the actual state matches the desired state.
- GitOps-friendly architecture
- Infrastructure as code support
- Version-controlled configurations
- Desired state reconciliation
Organizations That Benefit from Kubernetes
Large enterprises: With its powerful automation and scalability features, Kubernetes is well-suited for large organizations managing thousands of containers across multiple environments.
Cloud-native applications: Kubernetes is ideal for cloud-native applications that rely on microservices architectures, providing seamless orchestration for containerized workloads.
Highly regulated industries: Enterprises in industries like finance and healthcare that require stringent security and compliance measures can benefit from Kubernetes’ extensive ecosystem of security tools and policy management capabilities.
Key Differences between Nomad and Kubernetes
The fundamental differences between Nomad and Kubernetes extend far beyond their basic architectures, encompassing various aspects of their design philosophy, operational model, and implementation approach.
Architecture and Components
Nomad’s architecture emphasizes simplicity with its single binary deployment model. The core system consists of server nodes that handle scheduling decisions and client nodes that execute workloads. This straightforward design reduces operational complexity and makes troubleshooting more manageable.
In contrast, Kubernetes operates with multiple interdependent components: the API server, scheduler, controller manager, etcd for state management, and kubelet on each node. While this distributed architecture provides greater flexibility and feature richness, it also increases the system’s complexity and operational overhead.
Ease of Use
Known for its user-friendly interface and ease of setup, Nomad can be deployed quickly with minimal configuration.
Kubernetes is more powerful but comes with a steeper learning curve. Managing Kubernetes requires a deeper understanding of its various components and configuration options.
Orchestration Model
Nomad approaches orchestration with a focus on workload scheduling, treating containers as just one of many supported runtime environments. Its scheduler makes placement decisions based on bin packing algorithms that optimize resource utilization across the cluster.
Kubernetes, however, takes a container-first approach, with pods as the primary deployment unit. Its orchestration model includes sophisticated features like pod affinity rules, taints and tolerations, and advanced scheduling constraints that enable fine-grained control over workload placement.
Service Discovery and Networking
Nomad integrates seamlessly with Consul for service discovery and relies on existing networking solutions, allowing organizations to leverage their current infrastructure investments.
Kubernetes, on the other hand, includes built-in service discovery through its DNS service and provides a comprehensive networking model with services, ingress controllers, and network policies. This integrated approach offers more features out of the box but requires learning and managing additional components.
Community and Ecosystem
Nomad’s community is smaller but growing. It integrates well with other HashiCorp tools like Consul and Vault, providing a cohesive experience for organizations already using these products.
Kubernetes has one of the largest and most active communities in the open source world. Its ecosystem is vast, with numerous third-party tools, plugins, and services built specifically for Kubernetes environments.
Nomad in Production
A notable example of Nomad’s effectiveness comes from Cloudflare, which uses Nomad to manage its edge computing platform. The company chose Nomad for its ability to handle both containerized and non-containerized workloads efficiently across thousands of edge locations. Nomad’s lightweight nature and simple deployment model proved crucial for managing distributed infrastructure at scale.
Kubernetes Success Stories
Pokemon Go’s launch, powered by Kubernetes, demonstrates the platform’s ability to handle massive scale. The game’s infrastructure managed to scale from zero to millions of users within days, showcasing Kubernetes’ robust auto-scaling and self-healing capabilities.
Similarly, The New York Times migrated from a traditional deployment model to Kubernetes to improve its development workflow and application scalability. The transition enabled them to handle traffic spikes more effectively and reduced their deployment time from hours to minutes.
Infrastructure Requirements
Nomad’s resource efficiency makes it particularly attractive for organizations with limited infrastructure resources. A typical Nomad cluster can operate effectively with minimal overhead. This efficiency becomes especially significant in edge computing scenarios or when running in resource-constrained environments.
Kubernetes, while more resource-intensive, provides built-in solutions for many common challenges in distributed systems. Its control plane requires more substantial resources, but this investment is often justified by the platform’s feature set and robust ecosystem of tools.
Operational Complexity
The operational complexity of these platforms significantly influences their total cost of ownership. Nomad’s simplicity translates to lower training costs and faster operator onboarding. A small team can effectively manage a Nomad cluster with basic systems administration knowledge.
Kubernetes, however, typically requires specialized expertise and often necessitates dedicated platform teams, particularly in larger deployments.
Ecosystem and Tool Integration
Both platforms offer distinct advantages in terms of tool integration and ecosystem support. Nomad’s lightweight nature allows it to integrate smoothly with existing tools and workflows, making it an excellent choice for organizations that want to maintain their current tooling while adding container orchestration capabilities. Its integration with HashiCorp’s suite of tools provides a coherent experience for tasks like secret management (Vault) and service discovery (Consul).
Kubernetes’ vast ecosystem includes tools for every aspect of container management, from monitoring and logging to security and compliance. The Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) landscape provides numerous certified tools and integrations, offering solutions for virtually any container-related challenge. However, navigating this ecosystem and choosing the right tools requires significant expertise and careful planning.
Conclusion
Choosing between Nomad and Kubernetes depends on the unique needs and context of your organization. For enterprises seeking simplicity, flexibility in workload types, and cloud-agnostic orchestration, Nomad may be the better fit. On the other hand, Kubernetes is the go-to solution for large organizations looking for robust, scalable, and feature-rich container orchestration, particularly for cloud-native applications.
Ultimately, success with either platform depends not just on the technical features but on alignment with your organization’s capabilities, culture, and strategic objectives. Consider starting with pilot projects to gain hands-on experience with both platforms before making a final decision for your production environment.
Whether you choose Nomad or Kubernetes, Pure Storage® container storage solutions such as Portworx® provide all the capabilities you need to efficiently persist and manage data for your container workload.
Modern Hybrid Cloud Solutions
Accelerate innovation with a modern data platform that unifies hybrid and multicloud ecosystems.
Modernize Your Storage
Learn more about the leading container data management platform.
